ONLY SRK IS KING!!!!!!!!!!

Today morning as I was reading the Times of India, I stumbled upon an article which said 'Who is the King?' and I was surprised to see the biasness of TOI towards Akshay Kumar when comparing him to King Khan.

I would like to reveal their biasness in the same manner as they put it in their article.

BIG SCREEN BATTLE:-
TOI View:- In the year 2007 Akshay had 4 hits and King Khan had 2, so naturally $ hits outweigh 2.
Rational View:- Akshay Kumar no doubt had 4 hits and its total collections excluding the taxes were to the tune of 290 crores including Indian and overseas collections, which means that on an average an Akshay Kumar film grosses 72.5 crores.
King Khan had 2 hits and its total collections excluding taxes were around 196 crores including Indian and overseas collections, which means that on am average, a King Khan film grosses 98 crores.

SO WHO IS THE KING?

SHOW THEM:-
TOI View:- It compared the TV shows of King Khan(Paanchvi Paas) and Akshay Kumar(Khatron Ka Khiladi). It said that while AKshay was perfect for Khatron Ka Khiladi but even Saif Ali Khan would have pulled off Paanchvi Paas.(Even Saif Ali Khan would also be smiling at this pathetic nonsense).

Rational View:- Akshay kumar was suited to do Khatron Ke Khiladi, because he is the only actor who had done films with 'Khiladi' and that would be on the minds of the public.
If Saif Ali Khan could have pulled off Paanchvi Paas, then the Star people could well have roped in Saif for a much lower price in the wake of the ever increasing inflation. But the question is not about pulling off the show. The question is about pulling the public to watch the show and nobody can ever compete with King Khan on that front. Not even Akshay Kumar because whatever King Khan tells India believes.

SO WHO IS THE KING?

Yehi hai right choice, baby?
TOI View:- King Khan endorses more brands than Akshay Kumar, so that reduces King Khan's credibility and increases Akshay Kumar's credibility.

Rational View:- The reason why Akshay Kumar endorses fewer brands is that the corporates don't find Akshay Kumar saleable enough. As simple as that.
King Khan endorses the most brands because all the corporates are aware of the immense saleability power of King Khan.
1) When Nokia ran through a rough phase amidst bursting of mobiles, it had to look to King Khan to boost up its dwindling fortunes.
2) When ICICI was flooded with rumours of bankruptcy, it went to King Khan to salvage them.
3) Even TOI had appointed King Khan as its Ambasador for the 'LEAD INDIA' campaign to give it a global appeal. Why did'nt it take in Akshay Kumar?
4) Hyundai took King Khan's help to compete its Santro with Maruti in the small car segment of the Indian market.
5) Kolkata Knight Riders was the only team that made profit in the inaugural IPL, because of King Khan's amazing marketing skills.
6) SRK was the only India offered Knightship(DATUK) by Malaysia.
The list is endless.......................................

SO WHO IS THE KING?

P.S:- Mark Twain had correctly said:- "If you don't read the newspaper, you are uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you are misinformed." Well.....after reading today's TOI, I am forced to believe it.